10. 'Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen' (2009)Face it people, we've created a monster. Following a strong positive reaction to his 2007 live-action franchise launcher, director Michael Bay went buck wild on the follow-up, piling on more explosions, more uncomfortable stereotyping, more leg-humping and more fights. (Can you even tell the robots apart when they tussle? We can't.) As if plot ever mattered, part 2's storyline somehow makes even less sense than the first movie's.
• Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 20%
• Box Office Gross: $395 million
9. 'Fantastic Four' (2005)Technically this was the second crack at a 'Fantastic Four' franchise, and this take was intended to be something like 'X-Men' for families; that much was made clear when director Tim Story ('Barbershop,' 'Taxi') was hired. But it's hard to imagine that parents took anything away from this one, which largely ignores Dr. Doom, one of the coolest Marvel villains ever, in lieu of more internal conflicts. Flame on? Hardly. More like flame out.
• Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 26%
• Box Office Gross: $154 million
8. 'Godzilla' (1998)That this, the 29th 'Godzilla' movie, came out almost exactly a year after 'The Lost World: Jurassic Park,' with its own dinosaurs-run-amok-on-mainland plotline, can only account for so much of our disappointment. Roland Emmerich's remake of the Japanese classic fixated too much on inside jokes (a mayor named Ebert) and on cramming in every single New York landmark. But ultimately, yes, the baby Godzilla attack, which ripped off 'JP''s raptors, is our main beef.
• Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 26%
• Box Office Gross: $136 million
7. 'Wild Wild West' (1999)An exercise in the power of word of mouth: This stinker raked in $50 million in week one, but bad buzz (Entertainment Weekly called it "a noisy, joyless, bizarrely static fiasco") turned off audiences and the pic barely doubled its total in the next three months. Star Will Smith later apologized for the film, which remade a 1960s Robert Conrad TV series, saying, "I made a mistake on 'Wild Wild West' ... When there's a 'Fresh Prince' movie, I hope I'm so far buried under something."
• Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 21%
• Box Office Gross: $113 million
6. 'Van Helsing' (2004) Picture James Bond as a 19th-century monster slayer who encounters every single one of his foes -- Mr. Hyde, Frankenstein's monster, the Wolfman, Dracula and his brides -- in the span of one movie, and there you have 'Van Helsing,' a ramped-up special-effects disaster of the "more! more! more!" energy drink generation. Sorry to say director Stephen Sommers blows his wad with action sequence after action sequence. Scary bad stuff.
• Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 22%
• Box Office Gross: $120 million

Reader Comments (32)
Nicholas at 1:49PM on Aug 17th 2009
first off i would like 2 say that some of these critics have lost there mind. i think transformers wes a great movie if u cant tell them apart get a hd tv this is 2009 and the storyline was also fine. u must be like my mom when watching a movie what did i miss??? what just happend????? i dont understand???? if u cant understand a movie as u are watching it read a book
ck at 11:49PM on Aug 20th 2009
The plot of Transformers was ridiculous. It somehow managed to be completely juvenile and one-dimensional while also being hopelessly unfocused and needlessly complex. Do you really want to understand it?
armani at 11:48PM on Aug 21st 2009
I love what you wrote. You nailed it right on the head.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! like most of us parents we do say "read a book" but I have to again give this movie 4. stars.!!!!
Rashad at 12:33AM on Aug 24th 2009
I totally agree with you!!!! Transformers 2 was AMAZING!!! It's the PERFECT summer movie.
savagemouse at 8:51PM on Aug 25th 2009
Wow, if anyone had asked me how a comment from someone who liked Transformers 2 would read, that's exactly how I would've pictured it. You do a lot of typing with your thumbs, don't you dear?
ANNETTE PUIG at 12:19PM on Aug 18th 2009
Who the hell is making these lists?! Totally disagree with alot of them..
Landon Fletcher at 3:22PM on Aug 19th 2009
This list kind of made me mad as I read through it. Granted, there were some movies in the list that were pretty bad. But after reading the reviews, it seems like the authors were looking for Oscar caliber performances in BLOCKBUSTER films. This isn't right. I love a well written movie. I also love to be blown away by pure action that requires no thoughts, other than "Wow!". Lists like these are what make me not want to read anything else on this site.
IMHO
Matthew at 11:32PM on Aug 19th 2009
This list of the top 25 worst blockbusters has so many terrible choices in it I can't believe it was allowed to be posted. Bad Boys II? Transformers 2? both of them great looking movies, good acting and a good plot to them. These critics need to learn how to watch a movie and look at it with a more modernized look.
Rachel at 2:54PM on Aug 20th 2009
yoooo wth! something is seriously wrong with whoever picked these movies! the majority of them were really good, someone please fire those people!
Taylor at 9:53PM on Aug 20th 2009
I agree with everyone on here. If its not one of the greatest movies made, it's gonna be on this list. I am a fan of at least half to three quarters of the movies on each of these pages. You have to put movies like Bruno on here before you start putting transformers on the list
Mark at 10:30AM on Aug 21st 2009
I agree with this list a lot. It's just that some films on this list aren't that bad. They are just okay or below average. I would have put Transformers higher. Van Helsing should have been 25 or 24. And I enjoyed the third Matrix, for what it was. A movie with awesome action scenes, with a plot that trips over its self. Otherwise, a popcorn film. I would have put Shrek the Third (I think that that made over 150) and Pirates 3 long with X-Men 3 on here though.
Matt at 8:19PM on Aug 21st 2009
It's a summer blockbuster it's not Shakespeare. I think this list is a little overly critical, but it does seem to have some main targets... count the number of Michael Bay pictures on the list, count the number of Will Smith pictures, and the number of Hugh Jackman and Ben Affleck pictures. Somebody call a studio and tell them if they put those three together in a Movie directed by Michael Bay, It'll instantly make a billion dollars and the author of this post might kill himself.
Will at 3:44AM on Aug 22nd 2009
that has got to be the funniest thing I have read on this entire site. Oh, I forgot to mention, I totally agree with you.
Reva at 9:00PM on Aug 21st 2009
He "blows his wad with action sequence after action sequence," And you're talking about the supposed tackiness of wild hogs?
James at 9:27PM on Aug 21st 2009
You would have loved Godzilla: Final Wars, a Japanese movie from 2000(?) In it, the original Godzilla gets in a fight with the 1998 American Godzilla (or "Zilla," as in he's NOT God, and GINO, Godzilla in name only)...and throttles him in like five seconds!
Speaking of -INO's, where's Halle Berry's Catwoman?!!? Which might have been WORSE than Batman & Robin? (I think we won't see Catwoman in the Nolan Batman universe for awhile...until they've erased this movie from existence completely)
duch2izback at 9:36PM on Aug 21st 2009
Transformers 2 was a GREAT movie! Gee, I guess close to 400 million so far is lousy, right? Just what is considered a great movie to the fags who made this list? 27 Dresses? Let me guess: You thought XMen 3 was better than Origins? You guys need to quit taking tokes off the ass bong and get with reality here!
kelly at 9:37PM on Aug 21st 2009
I have to agree with almost everyone that commented here! These people dont know what they are talking about..most of these movies were classic great movies that made a dent in the 20th century..and the list doesnt even make sense, if its a count down to worst clunkers..why would it go 102 million, 112 million 400 million and 200 million..wheres the most to least money here!..gayyyyyyyyyy
Tyler at 10:11PM on Aug 21st 2009
Are you really telling us Van Helsing has too much ACTION CONTENT for an ACTION MOVIE? I mean, the point of action movies isn't to sleep through them, but to be on the edge of your seat, watching a great actor fight a lot of monsters in this case.
Shandon P Hudson at 10:51PM on Aug 21st 2009
Another message from "Big Daddy" on what is "Right for you to watch" ..........
templarknight22 at 12:23AM on Aug 22nd 2009
I think it's funny when people judge something that's completely based on opinion. If you got ten other people in here, they would probably all put different movies. True, some of these movies are a little cheesy with some seriously bad acting but the reviews on some of these are a little harsh and pretty idiotic actually. Oh you mean The Day After Tomorrow events can't actually happen wow you're really uncovering a fallacy there. It's a damn movie not a documentary about global warming; who cares if it's real or not geez. As far as Transformers is concerned. That was a horrible pick for this. 395 million dollars is a lot of money for a so called bad movie don't you think?