Call Robert Zemeckis' latest performance-capture animation effort the 'Polarizing Express,' at least where movie critics are concerned.Some write that 'Disney's A Christmas Carol,' a 3D movie featuring Jim Carrey in myriad voice roles, takes Zemeckis' favored digital production technology to another level, with the characters delivering more depth of feeling than what was found in the filmmaker's earlier performance-capture films, 'The Polar Express' and 'Beowulf.'
Other critics, meanwhile, say the film has no feeling at all. Take a look at what the reviews are saying, then tell us what you think.
The New York Times: "But the surprise of this movie -- a welcome one -- is that, in the midst of obeying the rules of modern-day spectacle, it sticks close to some of the sturdy virtues of the source material. Mr. Zemeckis' script retains much of the flavor of Dickens' prose -- not just the catchphrases like 'Bah, humbug' and 'God bless us everyone,' but also the formal diction and the moral concern. The specters that pop out at poor Scrooge on his nightlong ordeal are certainly frightening (parents of young children, consider yourselves warned), but the dread derives much of its force from the cruelty and selfishness that define Scrooge's world."
The Wall Street Journal: "To put it bluntly, if Scroogely, Disney's 3-D animated version of 'A Christmas Carol' is a calamity. The pace is predominantly glacial -- that alone would be enough to cook the goose of this premature holiday turkey -- and the tone is joyless, despite an extended passage of bizarre laughter, several dazzling flights of digital fancy, a succession of striking images and Jim Carrey's voicing of Scrooge plus half a dozen other roles. 'Why so coldhearted?' Scrooge's nephew, Fred, asks the old skinflint. The same question could be asked of Robert Zemeckis, who adapted and directed the film, and of the company that financed it. Why was simple pleasure frozen out of the production? Why does the beloved story feel embalmed by technology? And why are its characters as insubstantial as the snowflakes that seem to be falling on the audience?"
Los Angeles Times: "The 'it's better to give than receive' moral to this story is almost lost under the snowdrifts of special effects. Then there is the blizzard of Jim Carrey's theatrics to weather. The actor voices eight characters, including Scrooge at all ages as well as the three ghosts who haunt him -- you can just see him in the recording studio pingponging manically around during one of the Scrooge-ghost tete-a-tetes."
'A Christmas Carol' showtimes and tickets
Screen Daily: "Less Disneyfied than its official title suggests, 'Disney's A Christmas Carol' is an engaging and relatively dark take on a seasonal classic that finds director Robert Zemeckis refining the performance capture animation technique he used to mixed effect on 'The Polar Express' and 'Beowulf.' With Jim Carrey doing an enjoyable multi-character turn and 3D further boosting the appeal, this faithful if intense version of the Dickens perennial looks set to be a hit with family audiences."
MSNBC: "Could someone please keep Jim Carrey and director Robert Zemeckis away from cherished holiday classics? We've already had to endure Carrey mugging it up as the Grinch while Zemeckis turned 'The Polar Express' into a bloated and freaky-looking theme park attraction, and now these two have gone and put the stink on Charles Dickens' beloved 'A Christmas Carol.'"
Hollywood Reporter: "'Disney's A Christmas Carol' is, in its essence, a product reel, a showy, exuberant demonstration of the glories of motion capture, computer animation and 3D technology. On that level, it's a wow. On any emotional level, it's as cold as Marley's Ghost."
Entertainment Weekly: "'Disney's A Christmas Carol' is a marvelous and touching yuletide toy of a movie, and the miracle is that it goes right back to the gilded Victorian spirit of those black-and-white films of yore. From the hypnotic opening shot, which seems to travel through every nook and cranny of London without a cut, Zemeckis signals that he's made a bold technical leap: The faces are now fully expressive, the streets and buildings so real you could touch them. Ebenezer, with his drooping flesh and coldly fearful eyes, is no caricature -- Carrey plays him with scolding sharpness and a plummy deep melancholy -- and his journey unfolds with a classicism that is only enhanced by Zemeckis' spangly visual flamboyance. He makes the ghost of Marley, for instance, a figure of true terror. After this grisly bit of paranormal activity, we can see that Scrooge's redemption has already begun."
The Village Voice: " 'A Christmas Carol' is a whiz-bang 3D thrill-ride with all the emotional satisfaction squeezed out of it. For what it's worth, the movie's performance-capture digital tricks all but abolish the boundary between live action and animation. That gives Jim Carrey, sunken into a great beak of a nose and a never-ending chin, a chance to show off the full range of his india-rubber body language as he morphs from bent old Scrooge to fresh young Scrooge -- in love and not yet warped by want and paternal abuse -- and back again to the money-grubbing grinch who's so cheap that he stoops to filch the coins placed over the eyes of his dead partner, Jacob Marley (Gary Oldman)."
Variety: "Shortchanging traditional animation by literalizing it while robbing actors of their full range of facial expressiveness, the performance-capture technique favored by director Robert Zemeckis looks more than ever like the emperor's new clothes in 'Disney's A Christmas Carol.' Charles Dickens' 1843 novella and screen perennial has been retrofitted here as a so-called thrill ride in which Scrooge zooms above the streets of London and rockets halfway to the moon and back, only because now he technologically can. But while curmudgeons, here qualifying as anyone who might prefer earlier versions of the classic tale, will frown, bright-eyed young'uns will ooh and aah from behind their 3D glasses, resulting in bountiful early holiday B.O. tidings for the company that has now incorporated itself into Dickens' title."
Time Out New York: "The unspoken theme underlying Dickens's prose -- that the money-grubbing Ebenezer is conversing with semblances of his own self -- finds near-perfect cinematic expression through Carrey's efforts. Despite his character's strangely pliable exterior, Carrey endows the miser with a seamless depth of feeling -- a quality only enhanced by the fact that he also plays the three spirits (Christmases Past, Present and Yet to Come) who haunt Scrooge and push him toward redemption."

Reader Comments (11)
lisette at 7:46AM on Nov 10th 2009
THOUGHT I WAS IN FOR ANOTHER HIT AS POLAR EXPRESS, BUT MY CHILDREN AND I WERE LEFT DISTRAUGHT AND WITHOUT ANY CHRISTMAS MAJIC AT THE END. ANIMATIONS WAS AWESOME, BUT THE STORY WAS DISTURBING AND VERY SCARY FOR MY 4 AND 6 YEAR OLD. NO REAL HAPPY CHIRSTMAS ENDING. WAS DISSAPOINTED AND MY CHILDREN WERE LEFT SCARED. WHICH THE STORY WOULD HAVE HAD MORE OF A HAPPY ENDING AND MORE OF WHAT THE TRUE MEANING OF THE REAL STORY WHICH IS " IT IS BETTER TO GIVE THAN RECEIVE" .
Adam at 3:40PM on Nov 11th 2009
Well i'm very sorry your kids were scared but to be honest you can't expect every movie to have a happy ending. My kids were not scared ages 5&9 but i agree the story line was dead and the only good thing about it was the effects.
Susan at 4:17PM on Nov 18th 2009
Sorry, but have you read the book?? The "true message" of the book was that we wander through life consumed with our own business when all around us are people in need. If we would just look up and see them and have some compassion and charity we can live life as it should be lived. I'm sorry your kids were frightened but had you read the book you would have been better prepared for what was to come. What were you expecting? Fluff like Cat in the Hat? My kids and I were very pleased with this movie - though I was at first rather wary. The scene where the Ghost of Christmas Present reveals Want and Ignorance and the transformations they go through was a sober look at reality and exactly what want and ignorance can produce. I thought this was a brilliant adaptation and even Jim Carrey and his over the top as usual performance worked.
leslo65 at 1:55PM on Nov 12th 2009
If you are in middle years, have seen Christmas Carol w/Alastar Sim don't see it even for the 3D. First of all the Alastar Sim's version, circa 1951 is light years better. The 3D, the reason why I was suckered into paying a $13.00 senior's ticket for was great 3D. There ain't no great 3D in this bore for an adult. Was going to walk out before Tiny Tim came on the scene. I didn't because I'm to cheap to waste the $13.00.
It will be good for kids under 13 years of age.
No marathon olmypian could keep up with Scroge.
If it had great 3D I would recommend it anyone. Again. there ain't no great 3D in this bore with anyone who has taste. That means people who don't think Judge Judy is educational, Dancing with the Stars is not absurd and that news is not phony, staged, rigged up lie.
Christine at 2:25PM on Nov 12th 2009
I am 60 and have been forever a fan of fantasy,science fiction and special effects.I also have seen christmas carol in all kinds of versions and I have to say that I completely enjoyed the computer version.When I walked into the theater I wanted to be entertained and I got my money's worth!
I salute all the talents that are able to put together such a show.Thank you!
ires at 5:56PM on Nov 13th 2009
i loved this movie yeah i agree it was to intense for the little ones but it was good... i love me some jim carey lol.. i would recomend this movie to anyone who love digitil movies
L.J. at 4:23PM on Nov 13th 2009
I was totally disappointed about taking my 4 year old to see this disturbing film. It's great for older folks who enjoy a thriller but is wholly inappropriate for young children. I think I helped to scar by daughter after having seen this...
Christine at 7:42PM on Nov 13th 2009
Who takes their 4 year old to a ghost movie, I was still scared of ghosts when I was 12 years old.I remember seeing "traffic" which deals with drugs and torture and little kids were sitting behind me, I could not even concentrate on the movie because I was scared for the kids.So don't blame the movie, blame only yourself!
L.J. at 8:58AM on Nov 16th 2009
Christine:
Are you serious? How old are you, like 12? Seriously, did my experience really get under your skin like that? My suggestion to you like I tell others who go off the deep end over other people's opinions on the net, LOG OFF! Seriously, or get counseling and meds...
Jack B at 2:14PM on Nov 18th 2009
The question was and remains, who takes a 4 year old to see this film? Have you never read or seen "A Christmas Carol"? Try renting or buying Mr. Magoo's Christmas Carol. It's more appropriate for a 4 year old and probably for you too.
L.J. at 2:28PM on Nov 19th 2009
No, the question remains, who questions someone about taking a kid to see a Disney Christmas film which, in the past, has been done in a child-friendly way successfully. AGAIN, had I known this version was darker, I wouldn't have done it. You people seriously need to get a life...