Disney's holiday animated film this year, 'The Princess and the Frog,' carries the torch of several firsts: old school hand-drawn animation that had its death rattle sounded nearly a decade ago, the casting of an African-American princess after years of tardy inclusion. And critics are responding ... very well.
As the story of a princess who finds her prince after kissing him while he is a frog, 'The Princess and the Frog' follows the two through a mystical journey across New Orleans. Since 'Up,' 'Cars,' and even 'The Polar Express,' animation for kids has undergone a dramatic transformation. Smooth visuals and computerized looks replaced the old fashioned, hand-drawn way, as today's kids have become more comfortable in a technology-dominated world. 2-D animation became another relic of the 20th century like an 8-bit Nintendo.
While the story may not be a hit for all, critics are nearly universally celebrating the high wire acts of 'The Princess and the Frog' in its attempts to play catch-up. Movie critics can be a cynical bunch -- but their hearts are open to this movie.
Entertainment Weekly: "Young viewers of 'The Princess and the Frog' won't give a croak that the marvelous new adventure from Walt Disney Animation Studios has been created using the same hand-drawn, 2-D techniques that entertained those viewers' 'Bambi'-loving grandparents more than 65 years ago. But adults should: This old-fashioned charmer holds its own beside the motion-capture elegance of Disney's 'A Christmas Carol,' the engrossing stop-motion universes of 'Coraline' and 'Fantastic Mr. Fox,' the CG-enhanced genius of 'Up,' the wonder of 3-D technology, and, indeed, the unique, hand-drawn Japanese artistry of Hayao Miyazaki's 'Ponyo' as the year's deepest, most affecting, and most inventive movies."
Associated Press: "Thankfully, the spirit of animation maestro Walt Disney lives on. The studio has gone back to its roots with a fresh, funny retelling of a classic fairy tale in 'The Princess and the Frog,' Disney's return to hand-drawn animation after a five-year hiatus ... 'Princess and the Frog' isn't the second coming of 'Beauty and the Beast' or 'The Lion King.' It's just plain pleasant, an old-fashioned little charmer that's not straining to be the next glib animated compendium of pop-culture flotsam.
The Hollywood Reporter: "Disney brilliantly rediscovers hand-drawn animation and the value of story ... This is the best Disney animated film in years. Audiences -- who don't care whether it's cel animation, CGI, stop motion, claymation or motion capture as long as it's a good story -- will respond in large numbers. A joyous holiday season is about to begin for Disney."
USA Today: "The movie captures the traditional Disney aesthetic, with some up-to-date spins. Tiana is African-American, while Naveen's ethnic origins are less evident. The film embraces diversity in a natural way. The film's ethos is summed up by voodoo priestess Mama Odie (Jenifer Lewis) in her native patois: 'Only thing important is what's under the skin.' Where 'Pinocchio' was about wishing on a star, 'The Princess and the Frog' emphasizes backing up wishes with hard work. That proviso is a thoughtful message for young moviegoers."
Los Angeles Times: "Go ahead and pucker up. Because long before 'The Princess and the Frog' is over you'll want to smooch the charming couple, air kiss a romantic firefly and hug a voodoo queen in this foot-stomping, smile-inducing, heart-warming animated twist on the old Brothers Grimm frog-prince fairy tale. The filmmakers have brewed up a delicious roots story in every sense of the word."
Newsweek: "For what seems like forever, I have waited for The Princess and the Frog. This is the first Disney animated film about an African-American princess, and this delightful fairy tale couldn't come at a better time, what with the two little African-American princesses who live in the White House ... I'm certainly not suggesting that we all follow in the steps of a fictional character, but I am proposing that we take a good, long look at what the fairy tale is trying to teach the children of the world-and us. In The Princess and the Frog, we see a young girl not inhibited by the color of her skin or her suitor's."
New York Daily News: "Imagine the burden of legacy that the Disney team faced with 'The Princess and the Frog.' The first real addition to its princess lineup in almost 15 years, and the studio's biggest non-CG - that is, classically animated - cartoon in half a decade, it also belatedly brings racial diversity to a genre that's been mostly snow white for seven decades. Jiminy crickets! That's a lot for one fable to carry on its slender shoulders. The good news is that 'P&F' quickly cruises past the fact that Tiana is Disney's first African-American heroine. Unfortunately, the story that surrounds her often finds itself stuck in the swamp."
Reader Comments (120)
robin at 8:25PM on Nov 28th 2009
Has anyone seen this film? It doesn't appear to be the "normal 2-D animation" at all. Some of what I seen was rotoscoped (which Disney did back in the old "2D" day. Some of it is animation clips from older movies ("Jungle Book" for one) that was changed to look the current character.
robin at 8:41PM on Nov 28th 2009
Did these people see this movie? Disney used rotoscoping in their "traditional 2D animation" years ago and they use rotoscoping on this movie, too - that's only a tradition for Disney. And if you look at most of the scenes, you will remember the animation from other Disney movies ("Jungle Book" for example) that was changed to fit the current movie.
Magdy at 3:02AM on Nov 29th 2009
Well is that is the case what whatssup with that? is that crime (Geesh) want your money back?
BillSalem at 8:37PM on Nov 28th 2009
I, for one, am delighted to see the great old fashioned style art of the new Disney movie. The severely computerized animation only works for a few of the films since the switchover to cyber art. It always looks 'electronic'. Boring!
What is the big deal, that the critics are whining over the use of human beings over computers?
Marshy at 4:32PM on Dec 2nd 2009
Yes, I am personally glad to see the traditional 2D animation again. Haven't had that in quite a long time. I've got nothing against 3D, it works quite well for some movies (such as Cars and Wall-E) but I like seeing 2D every once in a while. Seems like every animated movie coming out in (American) theaters these days is 3D.
Nicole at 8:56AM on Nov 29th 2009
I am anxious to see the film, but find it really umm..."interesting" and disappointing that out of ALL Disney Princesses in Disney history, THIS one-first (and most likely only) African American Princess isn't even "African American" the entire film like ALL other Princesses are. She kisses the frog at the very beginning and becomes a frog for the remainder of the film. While all other white, asian, indian, and mermaid princess got to be beautiful for the enjoyment of our little children to watch, the African American Princess is a frog much of the movie. I guess that's to teach children that not all princesses are pretty.
Understandable concept, I just hate for our first African princess to be the "beast". This movie is the exact opposite of Beauty and the Beast. Anyway, at least for the first time, our kids with color can now dress as a Princess that "looks like them" for a change for holloween or other occassions. I hated growing up that I could never dress up as a princess b/c I didn't look like them.
Shonese355 at 12:03PM on Nov 29th 2009
I totally agree with you Nicole! I think I am more excited to see this film than my 7 year old daughter. I had to wait my whole life to see a princess that looks like me and people in my family. She doesn't know how lucky she is to have this film come out at this point in her young life. Disney has really dropped the ball by waiting so many decades...after all royalty originates in Africa so why did it take so long for a story of a black Princess to be developed? I am just happy that they have done it and of course done an amazing job just as Disney always does. Enjoy the film!
candice at 8:40PM on Nov 28th 2009
Im Glad They Did This Movie Like The Old Disney Movies Im Not A Big Fan Of The New Way Disney Movies Are Done Now! They Seemed Alot Better When They Were Hand Drawn
Kate at 2:38AM on Nov 29th 2009
i totally agree with you. CG pics are nice and all, but there's a warmth and heart in traditional animation.
Olive Oyl at 8:40PM on Nov 28th 2009
I guess Disney's Princess and the Frog has you believing that this story happened in American to a black girl/woman? She is being referred to as a "Africian American Princess" Say Goofy (movive critic Nicholas White) the U.S. doesn't have royality.
bloodnight at 9:07PM on Nov 28th 2009
I think the title of "princess' refers to Disney princesses--
michelle at 10:39PM on Nov 28th 2009
I don't think they were referring to it in a literal sense. It's a cartoon give me a break. She sure isn't white or latino.
Wanda at 11:52PM on Nov 28th 2009
Wow,Olive,you're really kind of dumb aren't you? Disney has always done stories about princesses and princes and royalty of all kinds. I guess you think "The Lion King" is about a "real" lion king,right? Lighten up and get an imagination.
Magdy at 2:59AM on Nov 29th 2009
Royalty well i guess you trying to say african americans dont have royalty... is that is?Wake up and smell the coffee! is just a movie dah!
adonrod at 6:24AM on Nov 29th 2009
If Disney wants to make a movie about "african americans" maybe they should go to the hood to get their stories, instead of stealing white ones.
Kataline at 2:13PM on Dec 23rd 2009
She is technically a princess because she was [SPOILER, LOOK AWAY NOW!] married to Naveen, who was the prince. Yes, she wasn't the princess of America (funny thought), but she was the princess of Maldovia.[SPOILER OVER]
Jamie Firth at 9:02PM on Nov 28th 2009
Screw AOL headlines. Everything is "controversial" in these 5-to-7 word snippets that make you curious to click the link. B.S.
There's nothing controversial whatsoever about this film, and AOL should be ashamed of its misleading title-links in AOL Today.
Start the countdown from when I switch my newsletters to a non-AOL email address. I was only holding on to this one for newsletters, mailing lists, and SPAM. It turns out that AOL's not even good enough for that.
Filth.
Gina at 9:59PM on Nov 28th 2009
I soooo agree.. They couldn't put something uplifting in the headline?? Only way to grab our attention is by some potential negative blurb..ur...okay... ironically..it worked..and I clicked the link.. but still they don't have to sink so low...
Jp at 10:51PM on Nov 28th 2009
I triple that.
You can't even write an email anymore without an AOL add annoyingly flashing.
Time to give this crap up.
JoEy GoLd at 12:39AM on Nov 29th 2009
jamie,
u hit the nail on the head! AOL is sooooo f&*kin predictable...the sensationalize some NON-STORY to get you interested. They are the lowest form of information and partly responsible for the trend of global dumbing down!
joey